Covert Tactics and Delayed Releases: The $191M Earnout Controversy Unraveled

  • Hannah Paul
  • 19 Nov 2025
Covert Tactics and Delayed Releases: The $191M Earnout Controversy Unraveled

An emerging controversy has surfaced involving a major gaming publisher and the creative team behind a highly anticipated sequel. The conflict centers on financial disputes and the methods allegedly used to delay a game's release.

The developers and founders of the sequel contend that the publisher set up a covert unit to obstruct payments. They claim this group, referred to by insiders as a special project, was engineered to postpone the release and thus prevent the triggering of a significant earnout.

Matters escalated following the deferral of the game's early access launch in July. This action intensified tensions between the development team and the publisher, deepening the dispute over financial commitments.

Industry reports indicate that the publisher’s chief executive took drastic measures aimed at hindering the delayed title. It is alleged that the intention was to avoid the earnout obligation, thereby sidestepping potential reputational damage and preserving his position.

An internal legal brief outlines several key points:

  • The company allegedly dismissed the original founders while delaying the sequel's release to avert an earnout payment.
  • Forecasts made by the finance department in May 2025 projected a base-case earnout in the vicinity of $191 million, prompting efforts to eliminate this financial burden.
  • The executive in question is accused of viewing the contract with the developers as unfavorable and reportedly even sought guidance from advanced AI platforms on avoiding the payment.

The brief further asserts that both the corporate bottom line and the executive's job security were at stake, prompting actions designed to neutralize the financial threat. However, these assertions remain subject to judicial review.

While a legal determination is pending, preliminary documents appear to present the publisher in a highly unfavorable light, underscoring the ongoing dispute over the handling of this major financial commitment.

Latest Articles

Scroll to Top